The difference between male and female self defense training. Is it really a thing?

The opinions here vary. And as someone who teaches self defense to both men and women, I myself have questioned the answer in the past.

Nicholas Polo’s student during Krav Maga training

The idea that women should train in self defense differently from men comes from the fact that the majority of attacks against women are made by men and also the fact that an average man is physically stronger than an average woman.       

However when it comes to Krav Maga, this is a self-defense system renowned for its practicality and effectiveness. Unlike many traditional martial arts, Krav Maga is designed to be applicable and effective for everyone, regardless of height, size, strength and gender. This inclusivity is not just a matter of principle; it's embedded in the very fabric of Krav Maga's techniques and philosophy. So here are some general aspects to consider.

Foundation of the self defense system

Krav Maga was developed for the Israeli Defense Forces, where men and women serve together in combat roles. Therefore, the system was created with the understanding that both men and women need to be able to defend themselves effectively. This foundational principle ensures that the techniques are accessible to all, regardless of physical differences.

Focus on Natural Movements

One of the core tenets of Krav Maga is its reliance on natural body movements and instincts. The techniques are based on simple, instinctive motions that can be executed by anyone. Krav Maga is not martial arts and a system that involves choreographic movements which you probably forget and go out of the window in real life situations. This focus on natural movement means that the techniques do not require specific physical attributes such as strength or size, making them equally effective for men and women. The idea is that movements match human instinct. For example if when we open a kitchen cupboard and a can of tuna starts to fall down, most likely we would either jump out of the way, try to catch it or put our arm up to block the can before it hits our head. This reaction is not very different from how we would respond if someone suddenly lifted their arm to hit our head.  

Focus on Practicality and Efficiency

Krav Maga emphasizes efficiency and practicality. Techniques are designed to neutralize threats quickly and decisively, using the most efficient means available. This emphasis on efficiency means that techniques rely on leverage, timing, and targeting vulnerable areas, rather than brute strength. As a result a woman who may be smaller or less physically strong than a male attacker can still apply these techniques effectively. Let’s face it. Any man, no matter how big and strong, he is equally vulnerable when kicked in the groin. And that kick can be equally applied regardless of the gender.  

Focus on Psychological Preparation

Self-defense is not just about physical techniques; it also involves psychological readiness. Krav Maga training includes mental conditioning to help practitioners stay calm and focused during an attack. This psychological aspect is equally important for both men and women, as it empowers them to use their training effectively under pressure.

The training often involves scenarios that simulate real-life attacks. This approach helps practitioners develop the ability to respond under stress, regardless of gender. Both men and women train together in these scenarios, learning to handle various types of attacks and attackers. This co-training fosters a realistic understanding of threats and how to counter them, ensuring that both men and women are prepared for real-world situations.

Another aspect to consider is that majority of people who learn self defense attend group sessions. In many traditional martial arts, gender-specific techniques or classes may be offered, sometimes implying that women need different or special training Krav Maga however, operates on the belief that everyone needs the same level of training and capability. This allows women for example to team up and spar with male partners which after practice builds more confidence and the physical skills to encounter a male attacker.   

So why the Argument?

The idea that women should be training differently or in female-only classes stems from a variety of aspects. Some argue that the reasons behind an attack against a woman is usually different to that against a man. We tend to associate attacks on women with sexual assaults, domestic violence etc. But if the self defense system is focused on targeting weak body parts, building confidence and improving sense or awareness then the training should not be different.

Another argument is that females are equipped with certain physical advantages when on ground. We often emphasise on women’s strong legs, hips and qualities which can be applied to improve your guard or prevent an attacker from getting a full mount. But then again the defense or counterattack techniques can be applied the same way for both genders. If someone got you pinned to the ground and he is trying to choke you, the escape moves would not be gender specific; detachment of the arms away from your throat, followed by hook punches to the ribs, perhaps an uppercut strike, explosive hip raise flipping the attacker off you and to the side.

Another reason is pure marketing. Running women’s only classes may suggest something specialised and tailored. That will typically attract more students. But it will also prevent a female student from perhaps overcoming some psychological barrier when it comes to fighting a man. Equally, the student will be missing out on the the opportunity to get a feel of what it is to fight a male. Mixed gender and same method training eliminates this disadvantage.

Bottom line is that over the years I’ve trained both men and women the same way. Results show that my female students who have a couple of years or training under their belt can put up a very challenging fight during drills by simply applying the same techniques as my male students.             

 

 

Nicholas Polo